The court explained the failure to block the website of the Ural cryptocurrency

Yesterday, the court of Nizhni Tagil has refused to block the resource on “the first Ural cryptocurrency” Magilton. Recall that a request to the Prosecutor filed a state Duma Deputy, and she complained to the voters. The judge explained the decision.

Russian cryptocurrency defended in court

Position reported the press service of Sverdlovsk regional court, reports TASS. The main reason for refusal was the potential contradiction of the government policy in respect of coins.

In the decision the judge referred to the fact that at the present time the Russian Federation has taken steps to legislative regulation and the introduction in the legal field of activity on circulation of cryptocurrency. And lock website would be contrary to the currently government policy in relation to cryptocurrencies.

The court noted that the Prosecutor insisted on the need to lock the resource. The argument was that in Russia the official currency is the ruble, and the introduction of other currencies and the creation of monetary surrogates is prohibited. The prosecuting attorney also reminded about the prospects for the growth of the shadow economy, drug trafficking, and money laundering.

The Deputy Kostenko remained dissatisfied with the decision. She sees Tailcone potential for online fraud.

We believe that the prosecution should appeal against this decision in higher instance. We will also refer to the Supreme court that they summed up the practice on this issue and prevented the discrepancies in applying the law.

Why is she so clung to Taillin is unknown. Other tokens of her obviously do not care.

Subscribe to our channel in the Telegram’s warm there. Because of Asimov.

0 Comments on “The court explained the failure to block the website of the Ural cryptocurrency”

  1. Most of the things you point out happens to be supprisingly appropriate and it makes me ponder why I had not looked at this in this light previously This piece really did switch the light on for me personally as far as this particular issue goes However there is 1 issue I am not necessarily too cozy with and whilst I try to reconcile that with the central theme of the position, let me see exactly what the rest of your readers have to point out Very well done

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *