Some models of the iPhone facing the threat of prohibition in the United States because Qualcomm

iPhone XS Max

The court of international trade U.S. issued its judgment in the ongoing case between Apple and Qualcomm. In one case, it turns out that Apple is not guilty, but in the second case, the judge sentenced in favor of the company Qualcomm with Apple in the contractor’s violation of patents owned by Qualcomm.

Judge MaryJoan McNamara stated that they will continue to ban the sale of all models of the iPhone that violate the patent of Qualcomm in the United States of America. And Qualcomm that the processors Apple starting from Apple A10 down to the Apple A12 Bionic violate their intellectual property rights, which are processors that are used in phones iPhone modern starting from the iPhone 7 access to the iPhone XS Max with the knowledge that the original complaint was only targeting the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus. The decision is not final, the committee will decide of government the decision by 26 July, after which it will be handed over to President Donald Trump for approval.

Note that if approved, this ban will only affect iPhones that use the world of Intel, this means that iPhones addressed for customers of Verizon and Sprint in the United States of America will not be affected by this ban because these phones are using the season belonging to Qualcomm.

By the way, the patent listed is patent that the number of the 8063674, which describes the mechanism of energy management. It’s not brilliantly image management, which caused the re-design of the Apple identity, their old to continue selling them in Germany. It should be noted that another judge found earlier that Apple violated patented power management, but it decided not to issue a ban.

All of this is part of the Great War between the two companies. Think the patents to Qualcomm dynamically for each wireless device. Impose a fee on devices that use the patent technology, even if not using chips. However, the company is obligated to license these patents under fair conditions and reasonable, but you say Apple that this does not happen. Believes Apple to Qualcomm to charge large sums, I stopped paying the fees of the latter until the problem is resolved.

Two years ago, accused the Federal Trade Commission and Qualcomm forcing companies to use their products exclusively and excessive charges. As you can imagine, was approved by Apple on these charges, but do not agree by Qualcomm in it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *