Overall comparison between processors: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and Intel Core i9-9900K

Is 2019 a great year for the purchase of (any MD) AMD, so with the launch of the new CPU and graphics card that have received considerable attention by the industry experts, enthusiasts devices. But this does not mean that they do not have stiff competition in both camps, with units Ryzen 3000 new in direct competition with one of the best processors (Intel) Intel. And wait to put the new processors from both companies in the month of July next.

There are comparisons great should not be held in the new set of chips (Reisen) Ryzen, but at the price of $ 500, we have the festival are: Core i9-9900K, and Ryzen 9 3900X, which would be best between the two companies.

Games

Retained Intel’s performance in the field of games for more than a decade, and even with units Ryzen first and second with a strong performance from AMD, still Intel Advanced. The factors VIII and IX processors from Intel are at the forefront in the more he cares about the players, which is: rate of frames per second. That can change with units Ryzen 3000 CPU, so with higher frequency, the increase in the instructions that the processor can implement it.

 

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

Intel Core i9 9900K

Node processor

7 nm

14 nm

The number of cores

12

8

Threaded

24

16

Cache memory: L2, and L3

6 MB / 64 MB

2 MB / 16 MB

Speed basic

3.8 GHz

3.6 GHz

Maximum speed

4.6 GHz

4.7 GHz

The graphics processing unit

There is no

Intel UHD Graphic 630

Power thermal design

105 watts

95 watts

After The Wizard Ryzen 9 3950X – which has 16 no – longer Ryzen 9 3900X the most powerful processor from AMD until now, it contains some specifications extremely strong. The processor Core i9-9900K not, as beats the AMD processor in some specifications.

With regard to the specifications, the processor Ryzen 9 3900X on the processor Core i9-9900K in the processor node, and the number of cores, and memory temporary secondary, and the core, while outperform the latter on the first maximum speed, the unit of the graphics processing, and demanded the thermal design.

Although the processor 3900X weaker than 9900K with regard to the authority, except that this does not mean that he is weaker in the games, with the he has temporary memory: L2, and L3 is larger, which makes it faster in games. Has the company introduced the AMD – through (Electronic Entertainment Expo) E3 2019 earlier of the month of June – comparisons show the superiority of the therapist on Intel processors.

Productivity

I had tasks productivity the multi-threaded, such as: convert and edit video, one of the highlights of what I have done AMD over the past two years, as they compete series Ryzen, and Threadripper directly, and so it excels on most expensive options from Intel. With the support of the nuclear lines-ins, it seems that AMD will continue in the negotiation of the Intel processor.

Efficiency in energy consumption

Don’t get efficiency in processors of personal computers and relevant that we find in mobile devices, where there is no battery life. However, the heat is an important factor, the more energy that is required by the CPU, the more heat generated. In numbers, we find that the processor 9900K of Intel’s more efficient than the processor 3900X, where the energy of the thermal design in the first 95 watts, and the other 105 watt. But this is not the full story.

Research has shown your requirements of energy to 9900K from Intel that consumes much more energy than the rating (TDP) the TDP. The web site, Toms Hardware that the energy consumption remains without classification while playing, but while doing the workload is multi-threaded and extended long, the processor may require more than 200 watts, and this figure may increase to 250 watts in the case raised the processor speed to maximum speed.

In comparison, the AMD processor current – 2700X – never exceed the rating (TDP) of its own, amounting to 105 watts, which is a classification relevant to know 3900X, which means that the latter will be better in power consumption compared to a processor 9900K from Intel.

Related topics what you read now:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *