Apple facing lawsuit anti-monopoly relating to its museum for the comments

The gate Arab news technical

آبل

The US Supreme Court agreed to listen to the resumption of the Apple in the lawsuit against the fraud-related Store apps iOS, which it accuses of sabotaging the antitrust laws of the Federal through the monopoly of the market apps iPhone and its paying consumers than they should be, which opens the door to a giant of technology to escape the censorship policies of its own application store and claims that are likely to amount to millions of dollars.

The lawsuit Apple a monopoly on the apps market so that they can charge excessive fees by up to 30 percent, while Apple, backed by the administration of US President Donald Trump, who urged the judges to consider the case, he could not be sued because the Commission imposes on app developers, not the buyers who are suing, as they defeat the competition through the approval of the application if the developer agreed to let him distribute them exclusively through the App Store.

And the lawsuit filed by the Federal Court in Oakland, California, and remained stable since 2011 to get the status of a class action lawsuit, a type of lawsuit where one of the parties is a group of people who represent them collectively by such group member, said lawyers following the case said that Apple may have to pay hundreds of millions of dollars depending on the needs of its market applications, which demonstrate in part on the fact that they are able to claim 30 percent of all applications sold.

The judges said they’ll listen to the appeal of the Apple in relation to the decision of the lower court that revived a lawsuit proposed by the buyer of the iPhone because of the commissions that you receive based technology company that Cupertino, California-based through the store, so that the leaders can expand the risk of damage caused by the fight against fraud against the companies working in the field of e-commerce rapid growth, which generate hundreds of billions of dollars annually through retail sales in the United States.

May lead the case to grant the app stores alternative legal protection, which leads to break the dominance of apple on what you call running on an operating system of its mobile devices, according to court papers, the claims of antitrust against Apple back to the lawsuit began in 2011 by many of the common iPhone in federal court within the state of California, including lead plaintiff Robert pepper of Chicago Austin Schwartz and Edward hetty and Eric terrill, the director said that Apple monopolized the sale of applications such as Messaging programs and games, resulting in inflated prices compared to the frequency of applications from other sources.

Potentially related to a number of companies to threats through such lawsuits consumer such as the Store app store App Store and ticketing website StubHub and Amazon and eBay, will also be on Apple to change its policies on a project by pumping, where the sellers individual setting prices, the company has expanded manufacturer iPhone to reject Claims For antitrust, saying the plaintiffs didn’t have legal standing needed to present the lawsuit.

He was a federal judge in Oakland, California to dismiss the lawsuit in 2013, saying that consumers are not buyers directly because of the fees that they paid has been passed to them by the developers, however, the Court of Appeals ninth in the United States of America, based in San Francisco revived in 2017 the judges said that Apple was a reseller sell iPhone applications directly to consumers must balance the claims of antitrust.

This is contrary to the decision of the court in 2017 with a similar resolution stating that people were buying apps directly from the developers, not Apple, in addition to that, the company refers to the decision of the Supreme Court in 1977, which stipulates that the line managers are only capable of prosecution under the anti-monopoly Law of the federal government, however, the Supreme Court decision of 1977 was a long time ago, have things changed dramatically with the internet and modern applications.

Apple facing lawsuit anti-monopoly relating to its museum for the comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *